What We Saw: Week 1

The QBList staff takes a look at the first week of NFL action.

Note: scroll down to the bottom of this article for links to the other week 1 games.

Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears


Are you ready for some football? I thought I was–being a proud Bears fan and all. It’s the 100th season, and we were facing off against our long-time rivals. Everyone was talking about the high potential of the Bears, and I’ll admit I was drinking the kool-aid. So what happened? Thirteen points. Thirteen measly points happened. This was a snoozer matched only by the last Super Bowl, and Green Bay held on for the victory. When it all finished, only two players came through (three in PPR) with the rest being a snoozer. So how did everyone look?


Green Bay Packers




  • Aaron Rodgers: 18/30, 203 yards, 1 TD, 5 sacks | 3 carries, 8 yards


After Green Bay’s first three drives, I almost thought something was wrong with Wisconsin’s future Hall of Fame quarterback. Aaron Rodgers only completed two of his first five passes, and he was sacked twice in those three drives. He didn’t have time to work and his throws were off-target. Well, something clicked after that because the next drive was four plays–all completed passes–and the only touchdown in the game. The highlight was a nice 47-yard pass to Marquez Valdes-Scantling as he found space from the defense. Things were quiet after that drive, and it’s clear that Chicago’s defense hasn’t lost a step. I think Rodgers was lucky to get out unhurt, and I’ll gladly keep him in my top-5 quarterbacks with optimism for easier matchups ahead.


Running Backs


  • Aaron Jones: 13 carries, 39 yards | 1 target, 1 reception, 0 yards
  • Jamaal Williams: 5 carries, 0 yards | 2 targets, 2 receptions, 15 yards


If you expected Aaron Jones to immediately be a successful bell-cow back I have bad news for you. It doesn’t look like Jamaal Williams will ever completely go away, and this was not the best matchup to begin with. Jones was often met at the line by the Bears pressure, so it’s impressive that he still averaged three yards per carry. He had a few nice runs to save his day, and I still love his talent. That being said, there are lingering worries that this could become a full-on timeshare. Williams did even less than Jones, but he continues to be the better pass-protector. This, along with his ability to catch passes, will keep him relevant. He will need an injury to Jones, however, to really matter in fantasy. Stick with Jones as a starter and keep an eye on Williams–just in case.


Wide Receivers/ Tight Ends


  • Marquez Valdes-Scantling: 6 targets, 4 receptions, 52 yards | 1 carry, 0 yards
  • Davante Adams: 8 targets, 4 receptions, 36 yards
  • Jimmy Graham: 6 targets, 3 receptions, 30 yards, 1 TD


There was a bit of intrigue in the passing game as to who would become the second target: Geronimo Allison or Marquez Valdes-Scantling. MVS had a solid day against a tough opponent while Allison failed to crack the box score. I still want to see a few more games, but I continue to be much more interested in Valdes-Scantling than I am in Allison. Both should be useful during the season on what figures to be a high-powered passing attack but Valdes-Scantling looks to be separating himself as the clear second option. I am happy to use him in my flex and he may continue to rise.

Davante Adams had a relatively quiet day, but he was clearly still the favorite target. It was just hard for anyone to find much room. With his top receivers tightly covered, Rodgers looked to Jimmy Graham frequently tonight. Graham’s best moment came early in the second quarter when he boxed out a defender in the endzone, elevated, and made a great catch. Although he is a far cry from the athlete he once was, Jimmy Graham is clearly still a useful weapon and could be considered a low-end TE1. Just don’t expect great week-to-week consistency.


Chicago Bears




  • Mitchell Trubisky: 26/45, 228 yards, 1 INT, 5 sacks | 3 carries, 11 yards


I think Bears fans are going to fall into two camps after tonight’s games: the first is those who are ready to dump Trubisky after yet another mediocre (maybe that’s too kind?) showing. He stinks and we need to accept it. The second group will realize it’s only one game, the Green Bay defense looked good, and the game plan let us down. I can definitely see both sides. Mitchell Trubisky made some bad mistakes tonight–don’t get me wrong. I counted at least three passes that should have been intercepted, and the game ended when he stared down a receiver for a good hour before finally throwing.

At the same time, there were mitigating factors. First, I really do think the Packers’ defense is improved. They gave Chicago fits, and they didn’t allow Trubisky to run for open space. Second, I blame the gameplan. The weapons on offense seemed mismanaged tonight, and the only players regularly involved were Allen Robinson and Tarik Cohen. I think brighter days are on the horizon but I’m tempering my season expectations big time after this stinker.


Running Backs


  • Mike Davis: 5 carries, 19 yards | 7 targets, 6 receptions, 17 yards
  • David Montgomery: 6 carries, 18 yards | 1 target, 1 reception, 27 yards
  • Tarik Cohen: 0 carries | 10 targets, 8 receptions, 49 yards


The biggest question I had before the game was about how Tarik Cohen and David Montgomery would split the workload this week. Who would get more carries and who would see more targets? Well, I certainly wasn’t expecting Mike Davis to lead the team in rushing yards. This is probably the most frustrating part of the night for me, because I cannot figure out why the Bears didn’t just stick with their rookie back…at least for a few drives.

David Montgomery looked good in his extremely limited action. He fought hard for his yardage and I was excited to see what he might do with 15-20 carries. However, he saw six. Montgomery also made a nice grab downfield on a wheel route out of the backfield. He took off and then quickly spun around to make a great catch. Here’s to hoping we see more of Montgomery in the coming weeks.

Tarik Cohen was heavily involved in the passing game and I’m curious to see if this is a future trend…fewer carries and more targets. If it is, look out: he’s going to be a PPR monster. I am nervous to start Montgomery until we see him grab hold of the backfield from Davis. I will gladly start Cohen at flex, though, as he figures to stay involved in the passing game each week.


Wide Receivers/ Tight Ends


  • Allen Robinson: 13 targets, 7 receptions, 102 yards
  • Taylor Gabriel: 2 receptions, 24 yards


Let’s start this off by saying Trey Burton was out for the night. He was held out despite suiting up for warm-ups mostly as a precautionary measure. The passing game really centered around two guys: Tarik Cohen, who we mentioned earlier, and Allen Robinson. Robinson was targeted to a comical degree, catching seven of them. He did a good job finding space in the Packers’ secondary, and he could have had an even bigger day if not for a couple near-misses. Robinson won’t always see this much volume, but it was a nice start to the season. Expect him to float around the WR1-WR2 range and for him to prove himself a bargain at his preseason draft cost.

Anthony Miller was a whole other story tonight. Miller has been a favorite of many fantasy football experts, and he’s drawn comparisons to Odell Beckham Jr. with his style of play. Well, he hasn’t made it quite yet. Despite playing tonight, Miller was completely blanked from the stat sheet. I’m left wondering if he was dealing with some minor injury or if Trubisky simply didn’t see him. Either way, this game should be a reminder that Miller cannot be counted on yet. I have hopes for his eventual success. It just hasn’t arrived yet.


 — Mike Miklius



9 responses to “What We Saw: Week 1”

  1. Shawn says:

    What are the chances of adding snap % to the RB and receiver sections? Would be nice to have all that info in one place especially with all the rookie talent and opportunity this year.

    • Michael Miklius says:

      Hey Shawn. Thanks for reading! I’ll have to look into how easily I could obtain this data, but it’s a great idea.

      • Brad R says:

        I’m in a FAAB league. How much can we buy into Brown this season and what kind of FAAb bid should I be putting on him % wise? First year doing FAAB. It’s also a PPR

  2. Hartman says:

    Corey, why did you say Buffalo has an “offense that will look to run the ball more often than not” when their first run play was their 19th play of the game! They ran the ball maybe 4 times in the first half? Surely they’ll run the ball more than that, but they clearly showed with their no huddle empty back field sets that they want to throw the ball a lot more this year.

    • Corey Saucier says:

      Hey Hartman – thanks for the question! It’s true that Buffalo started out running their no-huddle and throwing the ball a lot more. They’ll definitely throw more this year and it’ll be easy, they’ve finished bottom 5 in pass attempts as a team for the last 4 seasons. But when they threw more yesterday, it led to two punts, two Allen lost fumbles, two interceptions (including a pick-six) and a knee to end the half. Their play-calling was much more balanced in the second half and as a result, they came back and won the game. Devin Singletary was fantastic in the second half. If Allen can’t do a better job of holding onto the football, Buffalo will keep him on a short leash. Before tonight’s games, Buffalo’s passing percentage is 15th in the league at 60.32%. I can see them finishing somewhere around there this season. Thanks for reading!

  3. Rob says:

    Julio’s TD was not against Rhodes, it was against Mark Fields who was picked up last week, Rhodes shut Julio down again. Kubiak is not calling the plays, the offensive coordinator is Kevin Stefanski. Nice try, failed on basic level stuff, Won’t be reading you again

    • Colin Weatherwax says:

      Great catch Rob. I just checked and saw that Rhodes in fact was not the one covering Julio on his TD. I guess this means the Rhodes are closed again! Secondly, the broadcast team was drooling over Kubiak’s gameplan in this game but I see now that he is an offensive adviser and in fact not the coordinator. Thanks for the comment. Looking forward to getting better every week!

  4. David says:

    Something I’d add in about the Ram’s not-so-sharp looking offense might be due to the fact that almost none of them played in the preseason at all. Same thing with the Packers. Same deal and one of the same conclusions I reached (also first game with new coach, for them)

    • Michael Miklius says:

      Hey David! Thanks for commenting. I totally agree and my Bears suffered the same fate. I think it’s clear that players need some preseason time even if it creates a small injury risk. Hopefully things shape up in the next few weeks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.